Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Heidelberg
Con to the question "Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal?"
"Active euthanasia, as we could further show, means a radical detachment from the traditional orientation of medicine. By its intention it does not aim at the 'good dying' of the patient but immediately at his death. With that, however, the physician inevitably passes and executes an absolute, ultimate judgment upon the value of a given, present human live. The concurrent evaluation of the patient himself cannot release him from this responsibility. On the contrary, the respect for the patient's will and autonomy stands in contradiction to the action of killing which destroys the autonomous functioning of the organism. This action against the living body is in itself directed against the person whose psychophysical union is the basis of all medical action."
"The Notion of Killing: Causality, Intention, and Motivation in Active and Passive Euthanasia," Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 1998
Experts MDs, JDs (Lawyers), PhDs and Religious Leaders with significant involvement in end-of-life issues. [Because end-of-life dilemmas require medical, ethical, legal, and in some case religious considerations, we view MDs, PhDs with a bio-ethical focus, and JDs/religious leaders with significant involvement as "experts" in the euthanasia debate.] [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Heidelberg
Editorial Board Member of Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology
Editorial Board Member of Psychopathology
Habilitation, Psychiatry, University of Heidelberg, 1999